.
The paper that champions the coast
.
Front Page
News
RELAX
Business
Comments and Mailbox
Sports
Shipping
Email Nation
Advertise on the Web
 

Comment 
Friday, April 8, 2005 


Mungatana and the fruit factory request

By WYCLIFFE MUGA /Coast Forum

In case you missed it, here is an illuminating story from The EastAfrican. The out-going director-general of the International Centre for Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE) in Nairobi once read in a local paper that Garsen MP Danson Mungatana had requested the government to put up a fruit-processing factory in his constituency. This is because mangoes were perennially rotting there for lack of buyers. 

Dr Hans Herren responded to this by writing to Mr Mungatana and requesting for an appointment. He had a proposal for the assistant minister, based on the products of a certain Swiss manufacturing company which produced "container industries". Such industries are designed to be set up in places which have no infrastructure. 

To Dr Herren’s considerable surprise, when he at last met Mr Mungatana, the MP could not recall ever speaking about the subject. He had no real interest in the possibilities that such "container industries" had to offer. Indeed Dr Herren left with the impression that the MP had never meant a word he spoke when he had made that plea for a processing plant on behalf of his constituents. 

There is a lesson in this anecdote that the departing ICIPE boss provided. It is that these weekend political rallies that our politicians are so fond of, are really just a waste of time. 

They forget their own words, as soon as they have spoken them. 

Anyone who has seen the sheer scale of waste in the mango plantations in Tana River District, cannot fail to sympathise with those who live there. Yet now we learn that the MP for Garsen threw away an opportunity to set up a fruit processing plant there. 


Port lessons from the Netherlands

When one of the many parliamentary committees recently visited Mombasa, its chairman, Siakago MP Justin Muturi, stated that as the port was already making money, there was no need to privatise it, as such privatisation would lead to loss of jobs. This remark touches on a matter which has not been satisfactorily resolved all these years: What really is the purpose of a port like the one at Mombasa? 

Is the port primarily a source of jobs for people of this region? Or is it supposed to make profits for the Treasury? Or could it be that the port is primarily supposed to act as a catalyst for greater trade for countries within the region, which depend on it for shipping out exports, and shipping in imports? 

Thinking about this, I remembered a conversation I once had with a man from the Netherlands who was visiting Mombasa. I asked about the sources of wealth in his country, as the Netherlands is really a small place. 

He told me that their two great ports played a big role in their economy: "You must have heard about how busy Amsterdam and Rotterdam are - among the busiest ports in the world. Do you think all those goods passing inwards through these ports are intended for our own internal market? Or that the many tons of exports are our own products? The Netherlands is a small country, and our needs are small. It’s the fact that many German exporters find it cheaper to use our ports that make them so busy. Amsterdam and Rotterdam are actually more efficient and cheaper to use than most German ports."